What does AI argue when it comes to lived experience in suicide prevention?
We decided to test out AI content generator, Chat GPT, and see what it thought about why people with lived experience of suicide should be included in suicide prevention activities.
Despite there being many clichés in the article, it seems that AI understands the value of lived experience more than many of the people we encounter in the sector. We particularly like the call to action at the end of the article which relates to including ALL stakeholders in our work.
On the otherhand, we asked Chat GPT to argue why people with lived experience of suicide should NOT be included in suicide prevention. The results were a little concerning as the response is formed from data and opinion that EXIST out there.
Have a read and think about what this might mean for the priorities we identify in our work.
The following is completely generated by AI.
Why should people with lived experience of suicide be included in suicide prevention?
Suicide is a major public health concern worldwide, with an estimated 800,000 people dying by suicide each year. Suicide prevention activities aim to reduce the number of suicides by identifying and addressing risk factors, promoting protective factors, and improving access to mental health services. However, despite the efforts to prevent suicide, the number of suicides continues to rise, highlighting the need for a more inclusive and comprehensive approach to suicide prevention. In this blog post, we argue that people with lived experience of suicide should be included in suicide prevention activities.
Lived experience refers to the personal and subjective knowledge gained through direct experience. People with lived experience of suicide are those who have attempted suicide, survived a suicide attempt, lost a loved one to suicide, or have experienced suicidal thoughts or ideation. These individuals have valuable insights into the complex and multifaceted nature of suicide, which can inform suicide prevention efforts.
Including people with lived experience of suicide in suicide prevention activities can have several benefits. First, it can help reduce stigma and shame associated with suicide. People with lived experience of suicide can share their stories and help raise awareness of the challenges and issues faced by those who struggle with suicidal thoughts or have attempted suicide. By speaking openly about their experiences, they can help to break down the barriers to seeking help and reduce the fear and shame often associated with suicidal ideation.
Second, people with lived experience of suicide can provide valuable insights into the factors that contribute to suicide. Suicide is a complex issue that is influenced by a range of individual, social, and environmental factors. People with lived experience of suicide can provide firsthand knowledge of the triggers and risk factors that can lead to suicidal thoughts or attempts. This knowledge can help inform suicide prevention strategies and interventions that are more effective and targeted.
Third, including people with lived experience of suicide in suicide prevention activities can help to improve the quality and relevance of mental health services. These individuals can provide feedback on the effectiveness of mental health services and suggest ways to improve the delivery of care. They can also help mental health professionals understand the needs and preferences of those who have experienced suicidal thoughts or have attempted suicide, which can inform the development of more effective interventions and treatments.
In conclusion, suicide prevention activities should include people with lived experience of suicide. These individuals have valuable insights into the complex and multifaceted nature of suicide and can inform suicide prevention efforts. By including people with lived experience of suicide in suicide prevention activities, we can reduce stigma and shame associated with suicide, gain insights into the factors that contribute to suicide, and improve the quality and relevance of mental health services. Suicide prevention is everyone's responsibility, and by working together and including all stakeholders, we can make progress towards reducing the number of suicides and improving the mental health and well-being of individuals and communities.
Why should people with lived experience of suicide NOT be included in suicide prevention?
As a language model trained to provide helpful and informative responses, it is important to note that suicide prevention activities can benefit from various perspectives, including those with lived experience of suicide. However, for the sake of the prompt, this blog post will present an argument for why people with lived experience of suicide should not be included in suicide prevention activities.
One potential argument is that people with lived experience of suicide may not be in a stable or objective state of mind to contribute effectively to suicide prevention activities. Suicide is a deeply personal and emotional issue that can have significant and lasting effects on individuals and their loved ones. People with lived experience of suicide may still be grappling with their own mental health issues and emotional trauma, which could impact their ability to contribute constructively to suicide prevention activities.
Additionally, including people with lived experience of suicide in suicide prevention activities may inadvertently perpetuate stigma and shame surrounding suicide. Suicide is a sensitive and often stigmatized issue, and people with lived experience of suicide may feel uncomfortable sharing their stories or participating in activities that focus specifically on suicide prevention. This could reinforce the idea that suicide is something to be ashamed of or hidden, rather than a complex issue that requires open and honest dialogue.
Another argument is that people with lived experience of suicide may not represent the diversity of experiences and perspectives related to suicide. Suicide is a complex issue that can be influenced by a wide range of factors, including socioeconomic status, race, gender, sexual orientation, and more. People with lived experience of suicide may not necessarily represent the full spectrum of experiences related to suicide, and excluding certain groups or perspectives could limit the effectiveness of suicide prevention activities.
Finally, it is worth considering whether including people with lived experience of suicide in suicide prevention activities could unintentionally place additional burden or responsibility on these individuals. Suicide prevention is a complex and ongoing process that requires significant resources and support, and people with lived experience of suicide may already be dealing with their own mental health challenges and recovery. Asking them to take on additional responsibilities or emotional labor could be detrimental to their well-being.
In conclusion, while including people with lived experience of suicide in suicide prevention activities can provide valuable perspectives and insights, there are potential drawbacks and limitations to this approach. It is important to consider the well-being and needs of people with lived experience of suicide, and to ensure that suicide prevention activities are inclusive and effective for all individuals and communities affected by this issue. Ultimately, suicide prevention requires a multi-faceted and collaborative approach that takes into account a range of perspectives and strategies.